|
Post by wijaya on Mar 26, 2009 3:58:41 GMT -10
this one going intermediate: Ed
|
|
|
Post by rigidifolia on Mar 29, 2009 20:49:03 GMT -10
Ed, very nice. It seems very well grown in your place.
|
|
|
Post by wijaya on Mar 30, 2009 2:48:13 GMT -10
Thanks, well it is just very plain green without color, hope the upper will be more exciting, I have another smaller insignis and the smaller one show a little bit red around the neck area of the pitcher.
Ed
|
|
wanakorn
Insignes
Viking squat red
Posts: 98
|
Post by wanakorn on Mar 30, 2009 4:58:53 GMT -10
N.insignis (Biak form) lower pitcher regards wanakorn
|
|
|
Post by rigidifolia on Mar 31, 2009 15:51:21 GMT -10
Wanakorn, that's a very nice form of N. insignis. Is it originated from BE?
|
|
wanakorn
Insignes
Viking squat red
Posts: 98
|
Post by wanakorn on Apr 1, 2009 23:31:29 GMT -10
Hi,rigidifolia
My N.insignis from BE right
|
|
|
Post by lamwn on Apr 10, 2009 17:24:23 GMT -10
Hi, here are pics of my N.insignis from BE as well. lower upper I'm a bit worried as to why they are so small; is this the normal size for mature pitchers? Remember seeing a pic which Sam posted, and his insignis pitchers were at least 20cm in height...but then again, after seeing his recent thread, i guess its not a good gauge for 'normal' size. thanks Lam
|
|
|
Post by phissionkorps on Apr 11, 2009 11:14:25 GMT -10
Lam, the Biak form is more diminutive compared to the Tayeve form. That could be the cause for the size discrepancy. The BE clone, IIRC, is the Biak form.
|
|
|
Post by unclemasa on Dec 15, 2009 19:34:40 GMT -10
|
|