|
Post by rainforest on May 31, 2009 8:32:43 GMT -10
M
|
|
|
Post by nepaholic on May 31, 2009 9:43:07 GMT -10
Wow very nice. I love the colours. i guess spectabilis x veitchii....?
Jens
|
|
obregon562
Nobiles
"I do believe Im feeling stronger everyday."
Posts: 387
|
Post by obregon562 on May 31, 2009 13:23:07 GMT -10
i second that guess! ot maybe spectabilis x truncata?
|
|
|
Post by rigidifolia on May 31, 2009 16:00:30 GMT -10
Perhaps N. eymae x N. veitchii?
|
|
|
Post by wijaya on Jun 1, 2009 3:33:30 GMT -10
N. northiana x veitchii???
|
|
|
Post by srduggins on Jun 1, 2009 11:53:48 GMT -10
since spectabilis x veitchii was already guessed, I'll go with (spectabilis x veitchii) x truncata
|
|
|
Post by sdcarnivores on Jun 1, 2009 14:21:33 GMT -10
Or (truncata x veitchii) x spectabilis. Leaves seem awfully truncata like to not have the species truncata as the mother or father though...
|
|
obregon562
Nobiles
"I do believe Im feeling stronger everyday."
Posts: 387
|
Post by obregon562 on Jun 1, 2009 15:14:53 GMT -10
thats what i was thinking sdcarnivores...the leaf idea that is.
|
|
|
Post by bonsay on Jun 1, 2009 16:18:41 GMT -10
isnt that the "probably the pretiest hybrid around" pitcher ?
|
|
jimmy
Urceolatae
Posts: 39
|
Post by jimmy on Jun 1, 2009 17:41:20 GMT -10
Is it a primary or complex hybrid?
I'll have to guess N. spectabilis x (northiana x veitchii).
|
|
|
Post by rainforest on Jun 2, 2009 11:50:19 GMT -10
There's no spectabilis in this cross.
M
|
|
|
Post by jonathan on Jun 2, 2009 12:03:27 GMT -10
((thorelii x rafflesiana) x thorelii) x veitchii ?
|
|
obregon562
Nobiles
"I do believe Im feeling stronger everyday."
Posts: 387
|
Post by obregon562 on Jun 2, 2009 18:18:20 GMT -10
veitchii x truncata
|
|
|
Post by srduggins on Jun 3, 2009 6:50:07 GMT -10
(veitchii x maxima) x veitchii
|
|
|
Post by jgriffin on Jun 4, 2009 9:27:38 GMT -10
North x veitchii seems likely but since it's already been guessed, I'll throw a "Hail Mary" out there and say veitchii x lowii(or the reverse).
Joe
|
|