|
|
Post by phissionkorps on Apr 25, 2008 13:22:41 GMT -10
|
|
|
|
Post by srduggins on Apr 26, 2008 7:08:48 GMT -10
They're all easy once you know what they are (OK, maybe not). It looks like a sanguinea cross to me, but whatever gave it that peristome, I don't know, maybe spathulata
|
|
|
|
Post by phissionkorps on Apr 26, 2008 9:40:52 GMT -10
Doesn't contain either of those, but you're on the right track. Two species, one that's more tubular, and one that gave it that peristome.
|
|
|
|
Post by cloudsitter on Apr 26, 2008 19:43:02 GMT -10
veitchii x alata or vis versa? since sanguinea was my first thought as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by phissionkorps on Apr 26, 2008 21:24:33 GMT -10
Female is right  |
|
|
|
Post by srduggins on Apr 27, 2008 5:30:06 GMT -10
veitchii x tobaica
or
veitchii x gracilis
|
|
daveh
Urceolatae
Posts: 38
|
Post by daveh on Apr 27, 2008 5:42:48 GMT -10
ramispina x petiolata
|
|
|
|
Post by macamus3 on Apr 27, 2008 6:31:27 GMT -10
I would guess alata x veitchii.
|
|
|
|
Post by phissionkorps on Apr 27, 2008 11:38:36 GMT -10
Steve is the only one getting close. Veitchii x t.....
|
|
|
|
Post by xvart on Apr 27, 2008 14:05:30 GMT -10
reinwardtiana or chaniana?
xvart.
|
|
|
|
Post by phissionkorps on Apr 27, 2008 14:12:18 GMT -10
thorelii!
|
|
