How this hobby can be more productive/growers' end
Oct 11, 2008 8:21:21 GMT -10
Post by rainforest on Oct 11, 2008 8:21:21 GMT -10
If you're in the business of producing, selling, mass marketing rare species. It would be very beneficial to produce SEED original material that is never tc'd for sale. Using superior species parents to make superior species offspring would be the way to go.
I don't buy the fact that only three clones of a newly discovered species such as N. hamata has germinated and tc'd for sale. To me, I believe that hundreds were germinated but at that time the idea was so long as there were a few tc clones available (monopoly) there would not need to be that many needed for perpetuation.
The same holds true for other rare species such as N. rajah, N. macrophylla, N. lowii, N. villosa, etc. Why is there just a few when anyone who has grown nepenthes from seeds finds large population swarms of seed germination, especially wild collected seed from species to be very viable and nearly 100% germination rate. So how did we just end up with a few clipeatas, few rajahs, etc. My feeling is that these growers ONLY kept a few or the ONE and discarded the rest. Responsible growing? not!
Solution:
We need to get back on track on saving the species. The attempts many suppliers have done is nearly worthless. With so few breeding genetic individuals available it would be better to start over again. It would be ideal for hobbyists to make an effort in propagating and perpetuating nepenthes species in a more responsible manner than what has been done by our current institutions.
I am not saying we should all go out and rape the forest to collect seeds, etc. But approach it in a way that registers our applications for proper collection through forest/wildlife agencies for the perpetuation of the species. If these businesses have obtained seeds for them to make profits and gains from them, it should be easier to obtain seeds for perpetuation, distribution and dispersal without monetary rewards in doing so.
They failed us the first round. We should do it today and distribute effort worldwide.
M
I don't buy the fact that only three clones of a newly discovered species such as N. hamata has germinated and tc'd for sale. To me, I believe that hundreds were germinated but at that time the idea was so long as there were a few tc clones available (monopoly) there would not need to be that many needed for perpetuation.
The same holds true for other rare species such as N. rajah, N. macrophylla, N. lowii, N. villosa, etc. Why is there just a few when anyone who has grown nepenthes from seeds finds large population swarms of seed germination, especially wild collected seed from species to be very viable and nearly 100% germination rate. So how did we just end up with a few clipeatas, few rajahs, etc. My feeling is that these growers ONLY kept a few or the ONE and discarded the rest. Responsible growing? not!
Solution:
We need to get back on track on saving the species. The attempts many suppliers have done is nearly worthless. With so few breeding genetic individuals available it would be better to start over again. It would be ideal for hobbyists to make an effort in propagating and perpetuating nepenthes species in a more responsible manner than what has been done by our current institutions.
I am not saying we should all go out and rape the forest to collect seeds, etc. But approach it in a way that registers our applications for proper collection through forest/wildlife agencies for the perpetuation of the species. If these businesses have obtained seeds for them to make profits and gains from them, it should be easier to obtain seeds for perpetuation, distribution and dispersal without monetary rewards in doing so.
They failed us the first round. We should do it today and distribute effort worldwide.
M